Introduction to Philosophy Coursera week 2 Quiz

In this blog you will find the correct answer of the Coursera quiz Introduction to Philosophy Coursera week 2 Quiz mixsaver always try to brings best blogs and best coupon codes

1. What exactly are we asking when we ask about the “status of morality”?

We are asking what is it that we are doing when we make moral judgments.
We are asking whether abstract moral judgments are correct or incorrect.
We are asking whether particular moral judgments are correct or incorrect.
We are asking whether or not we can have access to objective moral truths.

2. Dr. Chrisman has mentioned three main approaches that philosophers have taken to explain the status of morality (the question of what it is that people are doing when they make moral judgments). Which one of the following is NOT a theory we will be discussing?

Relativism: the view that we are describing some kid of cultural or personal relative practice when we make these judgments.
Emotivism: the view that we are expressing our emotions towards the world when we make these judgments.
Objectivism: the view that we are representing objective facts when we make moral judgments.
Prescriptivism: the view that we are uttering moral imperatives when we make these judgments.

3. Which of these statements are TRUE about the objectivist view of morality? (Check all that apply)

Moral disagreements between people are basically disagreements over some objective fact about morality.
Moral judgments are like empirical judgments in that both are objective facts that can be true or false.
To an objectivist, polygamy can be both morally permissible and morally impermissible.
What makes our moral judgments true or false are generally dependent of the cultural groups we belong to.

4.An objectivist and a relativist would disagree over which of the following? (Check all that apply)

Whether the truth or falsity of our moral judgments can vary from person to person.
Whether moral judgments are just like empirical judgments.
Whether our moral judgments depend on the cultural groups we belong to.
Whether or not moral judgments are the sorts of things that can be true or false.

5.Which of these theories contain the view that our moral judgments are the sort of things that can be true or false? (Check all that apply)

Objectivism
Cultural Relativism
Emotivism
Subjectivism

6. Which of the following statements are CORRECT? (Check all that apply)

Since emotivism takes our moral judgments to be mere expressions of our emotional reactions, it faces the challenge of explaining how people appear to reason their way to moral judgments.
A challenge to emotivism is that it cannot explain the possibility of making moral progress.
A challenge to relativism is that we do not seem to have a method for resolving moral disputes.
A challenge to objectivism is that we do not seem to have an objective method for resolving moral disputes.

Practice Quiz: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?

1. If I know a proposition, I know *that* something is the case. Which of these statements could I have propositional knowledge of? (Select all that apply)

What’s that noise?
Ouch!
The monkey is in the tree
The egg is in the nest

2. What is the anti-luck intuition?

If you know, then your true belief is not a matter of luck.
If you know, then your true belief is down to your cognitive abilities in some significant way.
If you know, then your true belief is based on prejudice.
If you know, then your true belief is a matter of luck.

3. According to the classical definition of knowledge, which of these conditions are required for a subject to know a proposition? (Select all that apply)

The proposition must be true
The proposition must be interesting
The proposition must be justified
The subject must believe the proposition

4. A Gettier-style case is one where a subject has a belief that is true and justified. What else has to be in place before we have a Gettier-style case?

The subject has to be absolutely sure of the proposition.
The subject’s justification for the proposition that she believes has nothing to do with the truth of the proposition.
The proposition believed has to have less than twenty words in it.
The subject has to have thought hard about the proposition she believes.

5. According to the ‘no false lemmas’ account, knowledge is:

A belief that is justified, true and makes the subject happy.
A belief that is justified, true and about lemmings.
A belief that is justified, true and not based on any false assumptions.
A belief that is justified, true, and where the subject is not in a Gettier-style case.

6. Which of these is a sceptical scenario? (Select all that apply)

There is an evil and powerful demon controlling all my thoughts, feelings and beliefs.
What I think is the real world is actually a computer simulation – my real body is being kept in a pod, and fed with nutrients and information by super-intelligent machines.
I am very bad at forming true, justified beliefs – I try hard, but I almost always get it wrong.
I have a mischevous friend who often plays tricks on me to make me believe things that are false. I always have to be on my toes so as not to get caught out.

Quiz: Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive?

1. Consider the moral claim “Polygamy is wrong”. Which of the following is an example of a question about the status extit{status}status of that moral claim? (Select as many options as appropriate.)

Is it possible for the claim to be false?
Is the claim merely the expression of emotion?
Is the claim false?
Is the claim true?
Is it possible for the claim to be true?

2. Objectivism is inconsistent with which of the following claims?

Most people’s morals are corrupted.
The earth rotates around sun.
Human reason cannot see the ultimate truths.
‘Truth’ is only a matter of opinion.
Our senses can tell what is true.

3. To which one of the following claims must any moral objectivist be committed?

Moral claims must be supported by objective evidence, not mere feelings or opinions.
Moral claims are psychological claims
Moral claims are scientific claims
Moral claims can be true independently of what anyone thinks or feels about them
Any moral claim that is supported by objective evidence must be true

4. “No moral claim could ever be true.” Which, if any, view about the status of moral claims is committed to this statement?

Objectivism
No view is committed to this claim
Emotivism
Relativism

5. Which of the following claims are specific to moral relativism? (Select as many options as appropriate.)

Which moral claims are false here and now depends on the facts about you or facts about the group you are currently in.
Which moral claims are deemed false here and now depends exclusively on whether evidence supports them here and now.
What is fundamentally morally right and wrong can differ from one group of people to another.
What is held to be morally right and wrong is not really right or wrong, because moral claims simply cannot be ‘right’ or ‘wrong’.

6. Moral objectivism must endorse the assumption that all cultures, despite seeming to have very different moral codes, nevertheless share the same fundamental beliefs extit{beliefs}beliefs about what is morally right and wrong. True or false?

True
False

7. Emotivism is the claim that:

Objectivism and relativism are false.

Moral claims express emotional reactions.
Moral beliefs are not grounded in anything.
There will never be universal agreement on moral issues.
Moral beliefs arise from our emotions.
Emotions should tell us what is true or false.

8. Which of the following is the best objection to moral objectivism?

What is considered morally right or wrong varies from culture to culture.
Moral facts are knowable.
Morality is not within the providence of science.
Moral disagreements often seem unresolvable.

9. An objectivist and a relativist would disagree over which of the following? (Check all that apply)

Whether our moral judgments depend on the cultural groups we belong to.
Whether or not moral judgments are the sorts of things that can be true or false.
Whether the truth or falsity of our moral judgments can vary from person to person.
Whether moral judgments are just like empirical judgments.

10. Which of the following is the best extit{best}best objection to emotivism about morality?

If emotivism is true, then genocide is not really wrong.
If emotivism is true, then polygamy is not really wrong.
If emotivism is true, then it is unclear how we reason our way to moral conclusions, which we sometimes seem to do.
What is considered morally right or wrong varies from culture to culture.

Quiz: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?

1.Which of these expresses a proposition?

“What time is it?”
“Thanks.”
“The milk is in the fridge.”
“Shut that door!”

2. Duncan can ride a bike. What kind of knowledge does this require?

Knowledge-how
Knowledge-why
Knowledge-that
Knowledge-where

3. Knowing that Paris is the capital of France is an example of what kind of knowledge?

Ability knowledge
Propositional knowledge

4. Which of these methods of forming a belief is most likely to lead to a justified belief

Flipping a coin
Guessing
Careful consideration of evidence

5.On the classical account of knowledge what are the three extbf{three}three necessary conditions for propositional knowledge?

That the person wants to know it
That the proposition is true.
That the person memorises the proposition
That the person believes the proposition.
That the proposition is important to the person
That the proposition is justified.

6. Which of the following scenarios is a Gettier-case?

A man enters his house and does not see his wife. He nevertheless forms a belief that his wife is in the house. His wife is indeed in the house, but upstairs and out out of sight.
A man enters his house and sees a clever holographic image of his wife, which looks exactly like her. On this basis he forms a belief that his wife is in the house. By coincidence, his wife is in the house, but upstairs and out of sight.
A man enters his house and sees a clever holographic image of his wife, which looks exactly like her. On this basis he forms a belief that his wife is in the house. His wife is not in the house.

7.Gettier cases raise the question of whether a true belief’s being justified is enough for it to count as knowledge.

True
False

8. The ‘No False Lemmas’ account of knowledge attempts to respond to Gettier cases by adding an extra condition to the classical account of knowledge. What is that condition?

That the belief is not true due to luck
That the belief is not based on any false assumptions
That the belief is likely to be true

9. Which of the following claims does the radical sceptic make?

We are not infallible.
We do not know that we are not brains-in-vats.
We know that we are brains-in-vats.

10. Which of the following claims does the radical sceptic make?

It is difficult to get knowledge of the external world.
We have very little or no knowledge of the external world.
Knowledge of the external world has no value.

11. The radical skeptic thinks that even if we cannot rule out the skeptical hypothesis (e.g. that we are just brains in vats without bodies) we can still know basic everyday things like the fact that ‘sugar is sweet.’

False
True

12. Which of the following is the best argument for radical scepticism?

I know that I have hands. If I’m being deceived by an evil demon then I don’t have hands. Therefore, I don’t know anything.
I am being deceived by an evil demon. If I am being deceived by an evil demon then I can’t have knowledge. Therefore I can’t have knowledge.
We can’t tell the difference between being a brain-in-a-vat and not being a brain-in-a-vat. If I can’t tell the difference then I can’t know very much. Therefore, I can’t know very much.
In lots of cases, people disagree about what’s right. Therefore, we can never really know anything.

Important link: