In this blog you will find the correct answer of the Coursera quiz Introduction to Philosophy Coursera week 5 Quiz mixsaver always try to brings best blogs and best coupon codes
 

1. We have free will according to…

  • Libertarianism
  • Hard Determinism
  • Compatibilism

2. Determinism is…

  • The idea that as agents, we determine our own choices.
  • The idea that everything that happens is determined by the physical conditions that preceded it

3. According to determinism…

  • There is metaphysical uncertainty
  • There can be uncertainty only from our point our view
  • Any kind of uncertainty is impossible

4. Fatalism…

  • Is a stronger kind of determinism
  • Does not imply that everything is fixed at a micro-level
  • Is caused by the blind forces of nature

5. Libertarians defend that…

  • We really have free will
  • Liberty is an important value.
  • We are causes inside of the usual causal chain

6. Libertarianism is usually explained…

  • By giving an explanation of the way in which we are special causes
  • By quantum indeterminacy
  • By religion

7. According to Kant, the phenomenal self…

  • Is the physical part of us that is in the natural world
  • Is the thinking part of ourselves, which is really free

8. According to compatibilism…

  • What matters is how and what we decide what to do
  • Determinism is false
  • Abstract questions about the nature of causation are not relevant to moral responsibility

9. Peter Strawson claims that…

  • The thing that matters is where our motivations come from
  • The thing that matters is the quality of our motivations

10. Hard determinists…

  • Focus on how practical their theory is
  • Agree that we don’t have metaphysical free will but think we do have moral responsibility
  • Maintain that we have neither metaphysical free will nor moral responsibility.

 

 

 

Practice: Time Travel and Philosophy

 

1. According to David Lewis, what would time travel involve?

  • A discrepancy between “personal time” and “external time”: i.e. time travel takes place when our subjective or personal \textit{experience}experience of time does not seem to match what is going on in the external world.
  • None of the above: Lewis held that time travel is logically impossible.
  • A \textit{reversal}reversal of causal processes, so that everything happens backwards rather than forwards.
  • A discrepancy between “personal time” and “external time”: i.e. time travel takes place when personal time has a different duration and/or direction to external time.

 

2. Which of the following did David Lewis accept? (Select as many boxes as is appropriate.)

  • That contradictions are impossible.
  • That time travel does not necessarily involve contradictions.
  • That contradictions are possible.
  • That time travel necessarily involves contradictions.

3. Why is it logically impossible to assassinate your own grandfather before he had produced your mother or father?

  • Because time travel is impossible.
  • Because in doing so you would make it the case that you had never existed; but in order to assassinate your grandfather you must exist.
  • Because we will never have the technological capability to travel in time.
  • Because we do not yet have the technological capability to travel in time.

4. “Compossibility” is a notion that has to do with…

  • One set of facts being possible \textit{relative}relative to another set of facts.
  • One set of facts being possible now, but not in the \textit{past}past.
  • One set of facts being possible in the past, but not \textit{now}now.
  • The possibility of a person existing, even though his grandfather does not exist.

5. An event X counterfactually “changes” an event Y (in other words, Y counterfactually \textit{depends}depends on X) if and only if…

  • X and Y both in fact occurred
  • If X occurs, it is logically impossible for Y to not occur.
  • If X had not occurred, Y would not have occurred.
  • X is in the past and Y is in the future.

6. What constitutes a causal loop?

  • An impossible chain of events.
  • A chain of impossible events.
  • A chain of events that creates a paradox.
  • A chain of events such that an event is among its own causes.

7. Causal loops pose a puzzle: what is the entry point for the information in a causal loop? What is David Lewis’ response?

  • There is no entry point for the information in a causal loop – the information does not exist.
  • There is no entry point for the information in a causal loop – the information simply exists.
  • There is no entry point for the information in a causal loop – causal loops are not possible.
  • There is an entry point for the information in a causal loop – but we have not yet found out what it is.

8. Deutsch and Lockwood’s account of time travel involves multiple histories. David Lewis’ account, as discussed in previous videos, is importantly different: Lewis is concerned with time travel within a single history. Is this true or false?

  • False: Deutsch and Lockwood’s account does not involve any histories at all.
  • False: Deutsch and Lockwood’s account focused on time travel within a single history.
  • True: Lewis’ account of time travel focused on time travel within a single history.
  • False: Lewis’ account of time travel also involved multiple histories.

 

 

Review Option-1 Do We Have Free Will and Does It Matter?

 

1. Determinism…

  • Is different from Mechanism
  • Says that the only sort of certainty is uncertainty from our point of view
  • Is compatible with metaphysical uncertainty
  • Is the idea that everything that happens is completely fixed by the prior physical conditions
  • Defends the existence of fate

2. According to determinism…

  • Everything is fixed at the micro-level by a conscious agent
  • Every decision is determined by an enormous causal chain
  • Future events are fixed but there are different ways in which they can happen

3. The Existence of Quantum indeterminacy…

  • Shows that we have free will
  • Shows that mechanism is false
  • Is not relevant to the question of whether we have free will

4. Libertarianism

  • Claims that we are causes outside of the usual natural causal chain
  • Makes sense of how it is possible to act for reasons
  • Is hard to reconcile with a naturalistic worldview
  • Is best defended by appealing to a deity

5. Compatibilism claims that..

  • Determinism and moral responsibility are compatible
  • Our acts are metaphysically free
  • It’s true that we can’t do anything other than what we do. We are not responsible for predetermined acts.

6. According to Harry Frankfurt, what makes us morally responsible…

  • Is the fact that for every decision we make, we could have done something else
  • Is choosing our own acts through our own psychological mechanisms
  • Is libertarianism

7. Hard determinism claims that

  • Determinism is true and we don’t have moral responsibility
  • We don’t have metaphysical free will but we do have moral responsibility
  • We would only be responsible for our acts if we had chosen them freely

8. Peter Strawson defends the claim that…

  • The thing that matters for moral responsibility is the quality of our motivations
  • We have chosen our character freely
  • We don’t have free will

9. Hume’s line of reason is aimed to defend…

  • Compatibilism
  • Libertarianism
  • Hard Determinism

10. We are morally responsible according to…

  • Hard determinism
  • Compatibilism
  • Libertarianism

 

Review Option-2 Time Travel and Philosophy

 

1. David Lewis argued that time travel is:

  • Logically possible
  • Physically possible
  • Both physically and logically possible
  • Neither physically nor logically possible

2. Which of these can measure a time traveller’s personal time as opposed to external time? Please select all that apply.

  • The deposition of sediment along the Nile delta.
  • The movement of the planets in their orbit around the sun.
  • The cooling of the bowl of soup the traveller brings along for the journey.
  • The erosion of the soil along the banks of a river.
  • The traveller’s growing feeling of sleepiness.
  • The movement of the dials on the traveller’s wristwatch.

3. According to Lewis, the logic of time travel presupposes a distinction between time registered by the traveller and time registered by changes in the environment. True or false?

  • True
  • False

4. Which of these scenarios is logically possible but not physically possible in the actual world?

  • Making a 500 kilo sphere of pure Uranium 235 that exists for 24 hours
  • Making a 500 kilo sphere of pure gold
  • Making a 500 kilo sphere that is simultaneously a cube

5. To say that an event is compossible is to say that it is possible relative to a set of facts. True or false?

  • True
  • False

6. According to the ‘Grandfather Paradox’ argument, I could not travel back in time and kill my grandfather before he became a parent because…

  • My killing my grandfather before he became a parent would create a contradictory state of affairs.
  • It is physically impossible to travel backwards through time
  • I cannot affect any change in future events
  • My being in the past would not amount to my being real for that past

7. Which of the following expresses a counterfactual change?

  • If I had paid more attention in class, then I would have performed better in the examination.
  • If \textit{n}n is an even number bigger than 2, then \textit{n}n cannot be a prime number.
  • If the glass drops on the concrete floor, then it will shatter into several pieces.

8. David Lewis believed that it is possible to make replacement changes to moments in time but only to future moments. True or False?

  • False
  • True

9. The chief problem urged against the existence of causal loops that we have discussed is that:

  • Events that are causally linked must be connected linearly.
  • It is a mystery where the information could come from.
  • Causal loops are physically impossible.
  • Causal loops have never been observed to occur.

10. Which of these best expresses David Lewis’s view of causal loops?

  • The ultimate origins of the information involved are equally mysterious in causal loops and linear causal chains.
  • Causal loops and causal chains are equally important in explaining actual cases of time travel.
  • Causal loops and causal chains are exactly the same things.
  • Causal loops and causal chains are equally important in explaining everyday events.

 

 

Important link:

Trustpilot